Debating Residency Requirements

The Buffalo News’ “The ‘Burbs” blog posed a question yesterday that has been asked by many a municipality: should public employees be required to live where they work?


(Sorry for this lame picture. I couldn’t think of any other way to illustrate this story.)

Their post dealt with the Buffalo suburb of Amherst, but it’s a question that has been asked throughout our region.

Typically, municipal leaders – and oftentimes voters as well – favor such rules, which are often opposed by police and firefighters unions.

This has been a hot topic in Ohio with most of the state’s big cities, like Cleveland, Youngstown, Toledo, and others, pushing for residency rules.

The issue has even reached the state supreme court.

According to this Columbus Dispatch article, 134 cities and villages in Ohio have residency rules for at least some employees.

The cities’ argument – keeping employees close is important for public safety, and also keeps a large group of reliably middle-class workers within the city’s borders.

A Lorain city official once expressed his view on the subject to me this way, “If the city is good enough for you to take our money, it’s good enough for you to live here.”

Workers argue they should be able to live where they want, and “For far too long, a few cities have held their police officers hostage to high taxes, poor schools and mismanagement of municipal services,” an FOP attorney is quoted as saying in this story.

What do you think?



Filed under Featured, Politics, regionalism

4 responses to “Debating Residency Requirements

  1. schmange

    I heard someone say that if the Ohio Supreme Court strikes down the state’s residency requirements, that will be the end of the middle class in Cleveland.

  2. Sally

    Could you work for a federal government office in a border state, like NY, Michigan or Texas, and commute from Canada or Mexico? I have no idea, I am just curious. I mean, I don’t see why anyone would want to do that.. but in pricipal I’m just wondering.

    I think it makes sense to only hire locals for local government jobs! I think it should be in the rights of the localities to do that..

  3. Sally

    On the same token, can you live in Toledo and work for the state of Michigan? Or do you have to be a resident of Michigan?

    I would use Ohio as an example but Columbus is too far from any other state..

Leave a Reply to schmange Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s