The Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium, you know, the organization that’s supposed to fix all our problems (I actually mean that literally), recently conducted a study about Northeast Ohioans’ attitudes about the place where they live.
The group is emphasizing the fact that 90+ percent of respondents said they thought it was important for the region to be sustainable. Duh! I bet 90+ percent want the region to be prosperous, too!
Not to give these guys too hard a time, but there were other aspects of the study I found more interesting.
First, check this out:
Northeast Ohioans are generally satisfied with where they live. Except this: “The percent very satisfied increases with buy levitra oral jelly age. Only 22% of those 18-24 are very satisfied with Northeast Ohio.”
My only qualm about this buy lotensin online is I think it is a biased sample (though not in the http://pharmacy-7days-canadian.com/ scientific sense). These guys surveyed a statistically significant, random sample of the population. The problem motrin cost is, it’s all folks who live in Northeast Ohio and theirs aren’t the only opinions that matter. I just wonder how 24 hour pharmacy people who aren’t from Northeast Ohio — potential residents, ostensibly moduretic — would rate it. More interesting even would be how people who used to live here but left would rate it.
Moving on. This seems a little less rosy.
Even worse: “Those least likely to continue living in their current area are 18 to 24 year olds (41% not very or not at all likely) and those who have lived in their current area for 10 years or less (30%).”
Those surveyed were about evenly split on whether the region offered opportunities and advantages to keep young people here.
I also really liked this one:
To me, this study is a mandate to address the issues that are concerning young people. I think the way to do that is to adapt to change.